In 1994, the high water mark of Lefty Gun Control. The 103rd Commie Congress, led by Billy Jeff Klintoon, serial sex predator, passed and signed into law a wet dream wish list of gun grabbers and Statist scum.
An "Assault Weapon" ban. Gun racism which banned cosmetic features of rifles, a ban on pistols which weighed "too much" or had a barrel shroud, "high capacity" magazines made after the effective date of the Act (Sept 19, 1994) and by inches, a slew of other nonsense like...
Title 18, Sec 922g5b, which stated that, pursuant the granting of a Protective Order...as requested by "an intimate partner or FORMER (emphasis added) intimate partner"...*
(also known as an Injunction against harassment, Order of Protection, or Protection from abuse, in some jurisdictions)
...and after a "hearing", that the subject thereof was then considered a "prohibited possessor" of Firearms OR Ammunition under Federal Law.
Among many other outrages against the Bill Of Rights perpetuated by serial killer Slick Willie and Cankles, this aspect of the Law was introduced and championed by Congresstraitor Patsy Shroeder D (naturally) CO.
She of the perpetually constipated countenance made this part of the Bill her personal crusade. What she succeeded in doing was to unleash the use of the OOP as a cudgel that lowlife attorneys, and cunning Ovarians, used in Divorce and Family Kort Mafia proceedings and especially against men who had guns, gun collections or were involved in the firearms industry.
Now, the Courts are undoing this outrage after 3 decades. A hearing is not a Trial. To have a Civil Right stripped away based on a Judge's perception of alleged events is obscene. To make it more outrageous the prohibition could be made by a JP or any Judge who heard OOP hearings. Literally, a city Judge or amateur elected Judge (J.P) could strip away 2a rights based on allegations with ZERO PROOF.
Don't get me wrong. Rahimi in this case is an utter POS. But the Feds opened this box up by prosecuting him on 922G5b.
Now they're gonna get taken to the woodshed over it.
Duke Law link
* note, no time limit on how long previously the "intimate" partnership had to have occurred.
.
"I have to poop"
RIH evil slunt.
She just bit it a week ago. No loss to humanity.
An "Assault Weapon" ban. Gun racism which banned cosmetic features of rifles, a ban on pistols which weighed "too much" or had a barrel shroud, "high capacity" magazines made after the effective date of the Act (Sept 19, 1994) and by inches, a slew of other nonsense like...
Title 18, Sec 922g5b, which stated that, pursuant the granting of a Protective Order...as requested by "an intimate partner or FORMER (emphasis added) intimate partner"...*
(also known as an Injunction against harassment, Order of Protection, or Protection from abuse, in some jurisdictions)
...and after a "hearing", that the subject thereof was then considered a "prohibited possessor" of Firearms OR Ammunition under Federal Law.
Among many other outrages against the Bill Of Rights perpetuated by serial killer Slick Willie and Cankles, this aspect of the Law was introduced and championed by Congresstraitor Patsy Shroeder D (naturally) CO.
She of the perpetually constipated countenance made this part of the Bill her personal crusade. What she succeeded in doing was to unleash the use of the OOP as a cudgel that lowlife attorneys, and cunning Ovarians, used in Divorce and Family Kort Mafia proceedings and especially against men who had guns, gun collections or were involved in the firearms industry.
Now, the Courts are undoing this outrage after 3 decades. A hearing is not a Trial. To have a Civil Right stripped away based on a Judge's perception of alleged events is obscene. To make it more outrageous the prohibition could be made by a JP or any Judge who heard OOP hearings. Literally, a city Judge or amateur elected Judge (J.P) could strip away 2a rights based on allegations with ZERO PROOF.
Don't get me wrong. Rahimi in this case is an utter POS. But the Feds opened this box up by prosecuting him on 922G5b.
Now they're gonna get taken to the woodshed over it.
Duke Law link
* note, no time limit on how long previously the "intimate" partnership had to have occurred.
.
"I have to poop"
RIH evil slunt.
She just bit it a week ago. No loss to humanity.
Last edited:
